H4: Self and Custom Build Housing

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close
Canterbury
CT2 7RP
To whom it may concern,
Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national
policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council’s own
Local Plan of 2018.
Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is
completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district’s infrastructure
will also not support these plans.
Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated.
Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure
because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at
best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.
Regards,
Angry Man

[redacted]

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

The idea of having a minimum percentage of housing plots reserved for self and custom building is truly inspiring. This encourages individuals to invest in their living spaces, thereby fostering a sense of ownership and pride in their homes. Additionally, the provision for well-marketed plots that can transition back to general market use if not sold shows practicality on behalf of the developers. It eliminates idle land and ensures that there are no detriments to the overall development process. This policy enables communities to diversify housing options while also being sensitive to market dynamics. I firmly believe this strategy will pave the way for a more personalised and engaging future.

Taking the initiative to designate at least 2% of housing plots to self-build is a bold and progressive move. This encourages individuals to actively participate in creating their own homes, which inherently builds a stronger community connection. The commitment to ensuring these plots are serviced aligns well with the need for efficient development processes. Imposing a marketing timeline of 12 months before reverting to standard sale practices is not only fair but also illustrates the council's commitment to genuine self-build opportunities. I can envision flourishing neighbourhoods where self-builders collaborate, share ideas, and create a sense of communal pride. It’s an appealing vision worth supporting.

Having long contemplated the barriers to home ownership, I find the allocation of at least 2% of plots for self and custom builds a refreshing and necessary change. This not only supports individual agency in the housing market but also encourages innovation in home design. By ensuring that these plots are serviced and marketed effectively, the local authority is taking responsible steps to address current housing shortages. The fact that the proposal requires a full cycle of marketing before plots revert to normal use demonstrates a sincere commitment to fostering an inclusive approach to housing development. I'm particularly excited at the prospect of more residents taking part in actively shaping their community through this opportunity.

The two-per-cent provision for self-build housing appears to reflect a token gesture rather than a meaningful commitment to community home ownership. With the ever-increasing property prices, there is a pressing need for a more substantial allocation. Such a minimal number of self-build plots may result in frustration amongst potential self-builders, as the barriers seem to outstrip the opportunities presented. Furthermore, forced marketing for twelve months is seemingly oppressive and counterproductive, which can dissuade engagement altogether. Changes to this proposal should be considered to better align it with actual housing needs in our community.

The approach of mandating only 2% of plots for self and custom build housing is short-sighted. The growing interest in self-builds should prompt us to reconsider both the percentage and the lengthy one-year marketing requirement attached to these plots. What often happens is that even when individuals show interest, the logistics of self-building can be quite complex, meaning people may shy away from actively pursuing it if the opportunity feels scarce. Therefore, the current proposals could inadvertently stifle both innovation and thoughtful housing solutions in our local area. This entire notion needs reconceptualising to better enhance our housing landscape.

With the introduction of the 2% allocation for self and custom build housing, I must express my apprehension on this front. The proposal does not sufficiently emphasise the need for versatility in plot offerings, nor does it account for the diverse landscape of modern housing needs. An arbitrary one-year marketing timeline seems exceedingly rigid and does not consider the fluctuating nature of property interest. The current guidelines should be reviewed with a community-centric lens to identify what will genuinely work for prospective self-builders, who often seek easier access to land to fulfil their aspirations.

As a local business owner, I recognise the Local Plan as a pivotal tool for economic growth in our area. The emphasis on mixed-use developments is particularly promising, as these spaces attract foot traffic that benefits shops and services like mine. Additionally, its plans for improved transport links will only enhance accessibility to the area, encouraging more visitors and potential customers. The plus side of incorporating local businesses into the consultation process is significant; we can share insights to better cater to community needs. This plan has the potential to reinvigorate our local economy, and I cautiously look forward to its implementation.

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

Testing comments exercise!

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man

22 Rushmead Close Canterbury CT2 7RP

To whom it may concern,

Policy H4 should be completely rewritten. It currently does not take account of the national policy on meeting all housing needs and falls short of the standard set by the council's own Local Plan of 2018.

Self build and custom housing needs more detailed provision in this plan. Currently it is completely inadequate and will not meet the needs of local residents. The district's infrastructure will also not support these plans.

Policy H3 also should relate directly to the number of custom build sites that will be allocated. Currently the 50 sites allocated for housing will not be served well by local infrastructure because of poor local transport links and the lack of nearby green spaces, which, are sparse at best. There needs to be a direct link between this and the main policies on these topics.

Regards,

Angry Man